Akhirnya YB Ampangan dah empunya blog untuk memaklumkan berita Ampangan. Biarpun sudah hampir setahun di amantkan sebagai YB, namun masih belum terlambat melakukan sesuatu sebagaimana yang dilakaukan oleh YB2 PAKATAN RAKYAT (PR) yang lain.
So sila view blog YB Ampangan di :
http://rashidlatiff.blogspot.com/
Semoga dengan adanya blog ini maka rakyat nampak apa yang YB dah lakukan.
Nak harapkan masuk berita perdana atau radio negeri? Memang takde harapanlah melainkan berita2 berbentuk fitnah untuk membunuh YB dan rakan2 PR.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Sunday, October 7, 2007
Ramadhan berlalu, Raya menjelang tiba...
Ramadhan semakin berlalu pergi. Ini menandakan Hari Raya Puasa akan menjelang tiba. Ternyata masa bergeras pantas.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
FITNAH SEMAKIN GILA!
Amat menakutkan melihat aksi fitnah yang dilemparkan terhadap PAS. Media masa kepunyaan kerajaan (RTM) dilihat semakin menggila menyiarkan slot fitnah Batu Talam tersebut tanpa rasa malu dan rasa berdosa.
Aksi fitnah yang dimulakan dengan slot bakar bendera telah bertukar mejadi slot pak serban baling batu. Kedua2 slot adalah sesuatu yang pelik dan amat diragui untuk ditelan hidup2.
Pelik jugak, bagaimana pihak wartawan mampu mengambil gambar dari posisi yang paling cantik? Sehebat wartawan CNN pun tidak mungkin dapat mengambil gambar dari posisi demikian.
Hairan jugak, bagaimana dalam kekecohan tersebut pihak media dapat mengatur set pencahayaan yang cukup sempurna? Bukankan pada waktu itu hari sudah pun malam?
Sebegitu banyak tanda tanya? Lebih banyak lagi bagi mereka yang berfikir dengan bijak.
Sah itu perancangan jahat pihak tertentu untuk memburuk2kan PAS & PKR!
Aksi fitnah yang dimulakan dengan slot bakar bendera telah bertukar mejadi slot pak serban baling batu. Kedua2 slot adalah sesuatu yang pelik dan amat diragui untuk ditelan hidup2.
Pelik jugak, bagaimana pihak wartawan mampu mengambil gambar dari posisi yang paling cantik? Sehebat wartawan CNN pun tidak mungkin dapat mengambil gambar dari posisi demikian.
Hairan jugak, bagaimana dalam kekecohan tersebut pihak media dapat mengatur set pencahayaan yang cukup sempurna? Bukankan pada waktu itu hari sudah pun malam?
Sebegitu banyak tanda tanya? Lebih banyak lagi bagi mereka yang berfikir dengan bijak.
Sah itu perancangan jahat pihak tertentu untuk memburuk2kan PAS & PKR!
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
PAS N9
PAS N9 perlu pantas bertindak untuk menghadapi pilihanraya. PAS N9 perlu bijak membuat pertimbangan dengan mood pengundi di N9. Harus kita sedar bahawa rakyat N9 telah sekian lama bergelumang dengan UMNO/BN, maka kepekatan "nasionalis-sekularismanya" juga berada ditahap maksima.
PAS N9 tidak boleh menunggu hari pengisytiharan pilihanraya dan kemudian baru bertindak. UMNO/BN mampu berbuat demikian kerena mereka punyai kuasa untuk melakukan "salah kuasa". Bila2 masa sahaja pimpinan UMNO/BN boleh mempergunakan agensi2 kerajaan.
Maka dengan kekuasaan yg dibataskan oleh UMNO/BN, maka PAS N9 seharusnya memulakan gerak kerja pilihanraya dengan meningkatkan kelengkapan dan kesediaan dibahagian logistik. Perancangan tindakan / aktiviti selepas pembubaran parlimen perlu di nilai secara terperinci. Jangan malam penamaan calon, baru sibuk nak cari tenaga kerja untuk pasang poster dan bendera.
PAS N9 tidak boleh menunggu hari pengisytiharan pilihanraya dan kemudian baru bertindak. UMNO/BN mampu berbuat demikian kerena mereka punyai kuasa untuk melakukan "salah kuasa". Bila2 masa sahaja pimpinan UMNO/BN boleh mempergunakan agensi2 kerajaan.
Maka dengan kekuasaan yg dibataskan oleh UMNO/BN, maka PAS N9 seharusnya memulakan gerak kerja pilihanraya dengan meningkatkan kelengkapan dan kesediaan dibahagian logistik. Perancangan tindakan / aktiviti selepas pembubaran parlimen perlu di nilai secara terperinci. Jangan malam penamaan calon, baru sibuk nak cari tenaga kerja untuk pasang poster dan bendera.
Islamic State or Secular State – What?
by Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad, PAS Research Centre
The pronouncement made by the DPM that Malaysia is an Islamic State has expectedly sent shock waves across the nation. Already we are measuring swords between detractors and advocates of the 'Islamic State'.
The full-blown outcome of this 'debate', now turning into a war of words, has yet to be witnessed. Despite frantically writing "Dark Alley of Self-Destruction" following his "Jurisdiction Fault-line: Who's To Blame", the writer has now to pen down this piece, in an effort to mitigate the anticipated damage that will be caused by this edict made by the most uncelebrated scholar of neither Secular nor Islamic origin. Very sad indeed.
The DPM has chosen such an opportune time to unleash his 'well contrived strategy'. This may very well be presumptuous. What could be better than to have it pronounced on the occasion of the "International Conference on the Role of Islamic States in a Globalised World"? If Malaysia is anything but an Islamic State, what business has she to do with that conference? Hence, his insistence that 'we have never, never been secular...we are an Islamic State", logically fall in place, when refuting an allegation by a pressman that Malaysia is going secular. Appropriate though it may seem, it is not as innocuous as we would like to believe so.
The writer has deliberately used the word 'well contrived strategy' of the DPM. Yes it could have been his knee-jerk response given the theme of the conference. To say anything less than one that is premeditated, doesn't befit his stature as the heir to the future 'throne' and equally debasing to his supposedly high intellectual caliber.
Given the various debacles of the current regime and on the eve of the looming 12th General Election, what could be most efficacious than to distract the entire nation, nay plunge it into a fury of endless raging dispute of the 'very nature' of this 50 year-old nation. If it has worked the first time it was exploited by the then PM in September 2001, it should work equally well this time round. Why? Well, the gullibles (read Opposition parties, civil society and some sincere partners of the BN) are still as vulnerable as they were used to be. If the parameters are still the same and kept constant, the same approach should deliver the same result. So he thinks.
For as long as any notion of an 'Islamic State' is anathema to non-Muslims and a 'Secular State' equally an abhorrence or abomination to the Muslim constituency, the Umno-BN regime will continue to exploit this dichotomy as the best 'bogey' to keep the nation 'torn apart', 'united' and 'ruled' under the BN's hegemony. This is the greatest Malaysian paradox. The perpetrators turning saviors, while the citizens of the nation relentlessly mandating them, come every election. This is truly and uniquely Malaysian.
So what should be done?
Precisely this is the reason for writing this piece.
The writer is of the strong opinion that the continuing debate in this manner is in fact totally counter-productive to every effort of reform and change towards the betterment of the nation. Already the DAP is organizing an English forum entitled "An Islamic State After 50 Years?" parading on the panel everyone else except those representing the most ardent advocates of the 'Islamic State'. The inclusion of a panelist from them however, will only add to the vigour and rigour of the debate without alleviating its problem.
The plethora of writings by very distinguished columnists and academics now abound, are no less inimical to the one on the 'other divide', to say of the least. Both are waging their 'jihad' or 'crusade' and equally adamant to defend their democratic rights as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. The writer could empathise and concur with most of the arguments, be they historical, legalistic or intellectual in nature, coming from 'both divides'. However, he neither thinks it is necessary nor finds it fruitful to comment on each. He would simply side-step the entire debate.
If at this juncture, you think that the writer is merely trying to appease everyone you are totally in error. That will be the last thing he intends to do. On the contrary, he is almost at war with everyone, especially those who are espousing change and reform, yet taking the path of self-destruction! Let it be known to all and sundry, that no amount of debate will substantively change anything in the Federal Constitution.
It neither secularises nor islamises the Federal Constitution further. We can debate and discourse until the cows come home, but that doesn't change anything to the very foundation of this much embattled nation. It only deepens the fault-line, aggravates the prejudices towards the 'other' and delays the seeking of a new nationhood further.
If anything, the writer is keen to advocate that the nation is certainly a constitutional monarch supposedly practising a constitutional democracy. However, what is obviously and grossly wrong is that, this democracy has been relentlessly raped and trampled upon by the power-that-be. It is this crisis that is now most deserving of our focus so as to enable us to redeem our lost opportunity for genuine democratic reform and change.
Given the multitude of challenges at hand, from endemic corruption in government machinery to the sky-rocketing crime rate and all, we must not be sidetracked or distracted from standing united in addressing the real issues of the nation and swayed into the alley of self-destruction by the unending debate of semantics and rhetoric created by these inept leaders.
The nation on the verge of celebrating her 50th independence, deserves a mutually respecting citizenry celebrating our multi-cultural heritage and our religious plurality, so as to enhance our effort at national unity and integration. Only a vibrant and genuine democratic state will ensure and provide for everyone to partake and advocate their respective ideological commitments on a truly level-playing-field.
This shall remain our enduring mission that will unite us together. -ES
The pronouncement made by the DPM that Malaysia is an Islamic State has expectedly sent shock waves across the nation. Already we are measuring swords between detractors and advocates of the 'Islamic State'.
The full-blown outcome of this 'debate', now turning into a war of words, has yet to be witnessed. Despite frantically writing "Dark Alley of Self-Destruction" following his "Jurisdiction Fault-line: Who's To Blame", the writer has now to pen down this piece, in an effort to mitigate the anticipated damage that will be caused by this edict made by the most uncelebrated scholar of neither Secular nor Islamic origin. Very sad indeed.
The DPM has chosen such an opportune time to unleash his 'well contrived strategy'. This may very well be presumptuous. What could be better than to have it pronounced on the occasion of the "International Conference on the Role of Islamic States in a Globalised World"? If Malaysia is anything but an Islamic State, what business has she to do with that conference? Hence, his insistence that 'we have never, never been secular...we are an Islamic State", logically fall in place, when refuting an allegation by a pressman that Malaysia is going secular. Appropriate though it may seem, it is not as innocuous as we would like to believe so.
The writer has deliberately used the word 'well contrived strategy' of the DPM. Yes it could have been his knee-jerk response given the theme of the conference. To say anything less than one that is premeditated, doesn't befit his stature as the heir to the future 'throne' and equally debasing to his supposedly high intellectual caliber.
Given the various debacles of the current regime and on the eve of the looming 12th General Election, what could be most efficacious than to distract the entire nation, nay plunge it into a fury of endless raging dispute of the 'very nature' of this 50 year-old nation. If it has worked the first time it was exploited by the then PM in September 2001, it should work equally well this time round. Why? Well, the gullibles (read Opposition parties, civil society and some sincere partners of the BN) are still as vulnerable as they were used to be. If the parameters are still the same and kept constant, the same approach should deliver the same result. So he thinks.
For as long as any notion of an 'Islamic State' is anathema to non-Muslims and a 'Secular State' equally an abhorrence or abomination to the Muslim constituency, the Umno-BN regime will continue to exploit this dichotomy as the best 'bogey' to keep the nation 'torn apart', 'united' and 'ruled' under the BN's hegemony. This is the greatest Malaysian paradox. The perpetrators turning saviors, while the citizens of the nation relentlessly mandating them, come every election. This is truly and uniquely Malaysian.
So what should be done?
Precisely this is the reason for writing this piece.
The writer is of the strong opinion that the continuing debate in this manner is in fact totally counter-productive to every effort of reform and change towards the betterment of the nation. Already the DAP is organizing an English forum entitled "An Islamic State After 50 Years?" parading on the panel everyone else except those representing the most ardent advocates of the 'Islamic State'. The inclusion of a panelist from them however, will only add to the vigour and rigour of the debate without alleviating its problem.
The plethora of writings by very distinguished columnists and academics now abound, are no less inimical to the one on the 'other divide', to say of the least. Both are waging their 'jihad' or 'crusade' and equally adamant to defend their democratic rights as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. The writer could empathise and concur with most of the arguments, be they historical, legalistic or intellectual in nature, coming from 'both divides'. However, he neither thinks it is necessary nor finds it fruitful to comment on each. He would simply side-step the entire debate.
If at this juncture, you think that the writer is merely trying to appease everyone you are totally in error. That will be the last thing he intends to do. On the contrary, he is almost at war with everyone, especially those who are espousing change and reform, yet taking the path of self-destruction! Let it be known to all and sundry, that no amount of debate will substantively change anything in the Federal Constitution.
It neither secularises nor islamises the Federal Constitution further. We can debate and discourse until the cows come home, but that doesn't change anything to the very foundation of this much embattled nation. It only deepens the fault-line, aggravates the prejudices towards the 'other' and delays the seeking of a new nationhood further.
If anything, the writer is keen to advocate that the nation is certainly a constitutional monarch supposedly practising a constitutional democracy. However, what is obviously and grossly wrong is that, this democracy has been relentlessly raped and trampled upon by the power-that-be. It is this crisis that is now most deserving of our focus so as to enable us to redeem our lost opportunity for genuine democratic reform and change.
Given the multitude of challenges at hand, from endemic corruption in government machinery to the sky-rocketing crime rate and all, we must not be sidetracked or distracted from standing united in addressing the real issues of the nation and swayed into the alley of self-destruction by the unending debate of semantics and rhetoric created by these inept leaders.
The nation on the verge of celebrating her 50th independence, deserves a mutually respecting citizenry celebrating our multi-cultural heritage and our religious plurality, so as to enhance our effort at national unity and integration. Only a vibrant and genuine democratic state will ensure and provide for everyone to partake and advocate their respective ideological commitments on a truly level-playing-field.
This shall remain our enduring mission that will unite us together. -ES
Monday, September 10, 2007
Fitnah Bulan Kemerdekaan : RUSUHAN !
Rusuhan! Rusuhan! Rusuhan! Pembangkang merusuh di Batu Buruk!
Begitulah kata2 pemimin UMNO/BN cuba menfitnah parti B.Alternatif / pembangkang yg berupakan fitnah sempena bulan kemerdekaan yg ke 50. Sesiapa yg berakal pasti sama sekali tidak akan percaya kata2 fitnah UMNO/BN tersebut kerana selama ini program anjuran BA tidak pernah berlaku kucar kacir sedemikian rupa, melainkan pihak polis/FRU yg bertindak ganas mengganggu perjalanan program...contohnya bila time ceremah, pasti banyak rintangan dan halangan.
Saya juga pernah mengikuti ceramah BA, tiada pula sesiapa yg mati atau pengsan, tiada pula pesta arak dan sex! Malah tiada juga mereka2 yg sediakan parang atau bom api untuk merusuh! Maka dimana logiknya menuding jari dan melempar fitnah parti pembangankan merusuh? Jika merusuh sifat pembangkang, pasti sudah lama pemimpin mereka disumbatkan ke dalam penjara ISA atau di hukum gantung sampai mati...!
Maka salah siapa yg menghuru-harakan keadaan? provokasi dan sabotaj!
Tidak adil pulak jika kita meletakkan 100% kesalahan pada pihak polis/FRU kerana pasti mereka bertindak hanya menurut perintah pihak atasan. Almaklumlah badan beruniform sedemikian sangat taat pada pemimpin, jika tidak mereka yg susah.
Maka siapakah pihak atasan tersebut? Lain tidak bukan ahli politik yg takut pada bayang2 sendiri.
Untuk kes tragedi Batu Buruk, adalah amat diharapkan agar rakyat membuat penilaian secara profesional dan rasional. Jangan biarkan UMNO/BN memperbodohkan kita dengan cerita karut marut mereka...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
